But a new paper in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research suggests that — for reasons that aren't entirely clear — abstaining from alcohol does actually tend to increase one's risk of dying even when you exclude former drinkers. The most shocking part? Abstainers' mortality rates are higher than those of heavy drinkers.
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (130)
Its probably due to preserving of the liver. But seriously how many people do you know that would benefit from a drink to calm down?
Cheers, gonna pour me a Vodka!!!!
- 10 votes
Headed into the kitchen to pour a scotch on the rocks to celebrate right now! Remember, it's always after 5PM somewhere!
- 8 votes
As you all have noted... this calls for a drink!
Hm, my bar's a little run down at the moment, but I do have a little brandy handy. Cheers!
- 7 votes
Don't be fooled... This is exactly what the Big Liquor Corporations want you to believe...
- 6 votes
I would say this study is completely ridiculous. This is the equivalent of saying someone who smokes 10 packs a day has less of a chance of developing cancer than a smoker who downs a pack a day. My father struggled with alcohol addiction up until the day he died. He was a week shy of 50 years old. There is no doubt in my mind that his addiction led to his death. I guess you can say my opinion is biased, but i say what i see. I also lost two uncles and a cousing to drunk driving.
- 6 votes
This study has to do with the psychology of social interactions associated with drinking.
This really has nothing to do with say real physical health benefits of drinking where social interaction is not tested.
I don't drink period (my father and both my grandfathers were alcoholics), I will sip things for a taste, but I have never been drunk, have not ever had a full drink of any alcoholic substance, and when I did go out with friends I drank soda or water. I do not need to drink to have fun with friends. True conversely because I don't drink I don't go out to bars or anything like, these days, because I get bored. Of the times I did go out, when I wanted to, I had some fun, but I don't like being around people that get too drunk.
This study to me is basically saying to have a social life you have to drink.
And voila stupidity with the study
The authors of the new paper are careful to note that even if drinking is associated with longer life, it can be dangerous: it can impair your memory severely and it can lead to nonlethal falls and other mishaps (like, say, cheating on your spouse in a drunken haze) that can screw up your life. There's also the dependency issue: if you become addicted to alcohol, you may spend a long time trying to get off the bottle. (Comment on this story.)
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2014332,00.html?hpt=C2#ixzz0y993NjMd
- 6 votes
No one is denying that Drunk Driving deaths are horrendous, I lost a brother to one, well two, he got sandwiched between two drunk drivers.
Nor that alcoholism can lead to a horrendous lifestyle which can lead to an early death, but its not the drink itself its a culmination of all different factors.
In Germany while I lived there it was still east and west, and west germany, the size of conneticut or so drank as much beer as we did here in the states. No AA, it was the difference of cultures that struck me when I came home before I was 21. To my dismay I couldn't drink legally until I was 21.
Though to be honest, I didn't care as much once I had an "American Beer"
There's many on this thread that throw this out as hogwash, and give personal experiences to back up their beliefs. I've lived and seen very similar experiences but yet I know its not the drink that caused my father to be who he was.
You think maybe its possible that if people were less likely to say "oh he's just a drunk" we'd start getting to root problems of our loved one and help them heal?
But the reality is, the more something is demonized, the less it is used as a patsy to blame things on. And the more our kids will rebel to it.
- 12 votes
Been smoking for 48 years and drinking for 45 years. There are younger people who can't keep up with me. Why? Because we didn't have the pollution back then. We have built up immunity in our bodies. I do not say that smoking is good for you. I say that the environment has changed. Also, I say that cigarettes have changed. More chemicals and more in the kill every germ attitude. Germs build up tolerance. But now we want to kill all germs.
I have eaten tainted beef and never got sick. I was raised on raw beef. I have built up tolerance to e-coli.
The more we kill germs and the more we add chemicals, the more we kill ourselves.
We are not letting our bodies to adjust to the changes.
- 4 votes
So do mean drunks outlive good time charlies?
Jbird: Yes, I have several family members I can send you as proof:)
- 3 votes
Guys- this is not new- we been knowing this since I was in nursing school. That is a while ago...
- 2 votes
Blearc--
Ok first off let us get to the point here, no one is so much demonizing alcohol, however, it is hard to argue with the negative of alcohol. The point to this study is merely saying you have a social life because you drink. That is the point. It is not saying there are actual health as in physical health benefits, to drinking if someone was not sociable or the social interactions were not a factor or variable in this study.
But seriously moderate drinking is not a huge problem, but the key is MODERATION.
So I think you are not looking at this study correctly.
- 4 votes
Hold on!
Their may be something seriously inaccurate with this report.
I heard this report on CNN news earlier this evening, and I'm petty sure what I heard was MODERATE drinkers lived the longest, then non-drinkers and heavy drinkers lived the SHORTEST lives.
I'll have to look it up and bring back some links, but I just wanted to make people aware that this report may not be accurate.
- 3 votes
- 3 votes
actually it is always a matter of what sort of death you mean. Moderate drinkers live longest- there are in fact physiologic benefits to alcohol. Vascular dilatation anti- coagulation, stress reduction, socialization etc. Then there are the healthy alcohols- red wine, beers, white wines, higher end purified spirits...there are also very healthy lifestyles without liquor: exercise, socializing without alcohol, strong family bonds, great relationships, healthy diet etc.
Hard drinking is more likely to kill you in traumatic ways- victim of violence, drunk driving, liver failure, kidney failure, alcohol withdrawal ( the only withdrawal that will actually kill you). But there are alot of 'old drunks' usually they are younger in age and just look damn old.
Brother died a little over a year ago from alcoholism. Grandfather finally quit drinking in his 60s, but the congestive heart failure, liver disease was already on the course.
Live healthily, drink in moderation, develop great friendships, keep bonds strong. Control stress however you like, but control stress. Eat well, use probiotics and for heavens sake drink tons of water- just not all at once- cuz that will kill you too!
- 3 votes
I was responding to your magical disappearing post, Jer...lol.
- 2 votes
I looked into the group to find out there background, not extensively but they seem to have been around for a while and study alchoholism and the report is behind a pay wall.
I couldn't find them on sourcewatch.org. So unless any of you wish to pay to see whats behind it, we'll have to depend on the many articles on it.
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research is the group and they are not new.
- 1 vote
This research is not new. There is lots of data that show these things, and for free.
- 1 vote
I really believe the headline for this article needs to be modified.
The Title for the Time article is "Why Do Heavy Drinkers outlive nondrinker?"
However the last line of the article is;
"That said, the new study provides the strongest evidence yet that moderate drinking is not only fun but good for you. So make mine a double."
My question is, what does the Times author John Cloud* consider to be "heavy" drinking?
I'm 71 years old, my business life was surrounded with drinkers, being in the right place at (Cocktail Lounge) cocktail hour was extremely important to me.
And, I knew some HEAVY drinkers, they're all dead.
Most of us that knew when to call it a night are still around.
*See;
John Cloud: Today's Most Dissed Person in the Blogosphere
- 2 votes
I didn't mean to make that john Cloud link that large. I was posting it as a "correction" the time was up and I couldn't change it.
- 2 votes
Jerry I see your point about the headline, but I didn't change it.
It is a bit annoying that a scientific puplication is behind a pay wall. It would be nice to examine the methodology bit closer.
Maybe if we're lucky it'll show up in the WikiLeaks new Underground Nuclear Bunker
- 3 votes
the report is behind a pay wall.
I ran into the same problem. However I did find this;
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Don't get me wrong, I can still out drink most of the young "whippersnappers" around here. I just think Cloud is up to his usual habits and the article is misleading.
(I can't understand why Time still has him on their staff)
- 2 votes
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research -- My bet is that this is just a fancy-schmantzy name for a drinking club at the corner bar. They try to get 'research' funding for their nights out, comparing different beers, recording lifestyles and health details of the assorted members, and so forth. Sounds like fun. Where do I sign up?
- 3 votes
They only get more controlling when they go on the sobriety wagon!
Jbird: I get the controlling, but are they still mean when sober? I never really understand how previously well-balanced individuals can become so spiteful and aggressive towards anyone and everything after a drink.
- 2 votes
It is a bit annoying that a scientific puplication is behind a pay wall. It would be nice to examine the methodology bit closer.
Any alumi with access to their college library site?............ you can find the study there usually, and find out who paid for it:)
- 2 votes
etva- Well, he is tolerable sober, but when he comes to our house, he still tries to set the tone/rules. Ive only been married a couple yrs, and he's been sober longer, so Ive only heard the "drunk" stories. Basically the whole family grew up feeling oppressed, still a bit to a degree. I refuse to enable his attitude, so we have had it out before.
- 2 votes
Looks I'm going to live a long life then!
- 8 votes
I know the feeling. I just celebrated my 145th birthday.........
LOL
Actually, turned 50 last week.
- 8 votes
50 - you wanna talk 50- well how many more years you think you got?
You are now old enough to do what you want to do when and how you want to do it and you don't really care what anyone else thinks....enjoy!
- 2 votes
mortality rates are higher than those of heavy drinkers.
Except for my father who died at 43 from alcohol, both of my grandfathers who I never met because they died fairly young from alcohol, my sister who died at 56 from alcohol, a neice who died at 29 from alcohol, my nephew who can't stay out of jail because of alcohol and he's only 39.......and those are just a few in my family who've died and struggled with alcohol abuse.
Sorry to rain on the parade.....this isn't a good subject for me, but I wanted to throw my opinion in anyway.
- 9 votes
Take it with a grain of salt...perhaps govt had this finding put out to help speed up the effectiveness of their campaign to dumb us down. Don't get me wrong...I'd love to believe this...I like to whine...uh, I mean wine!! :)
- 6 votes
Sorry to rain on the parade.....this isn't a good subject for me, but I wanted to throw my opinion in anyway.
This parade needs to be rained on. There are many people out there that have lost friends and family member far too early in life from drinking.
I do not believe this report is accurate.
- 2 votes
Moderate drinking, which is defined as one to three drinks per day, is associated with the lowest mortality rates in alcohol studies.
I'm good. Wine or Cognac made from wine. Bottles last me a long time, not a heavy or a binge drinker.
- 4 votes
Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers, Study Finds
The only reason heavy drinkers outlive non-drinkers is cuz the drinkers *RUN OVER* or hit non-drinkers in vehicles... Family members were in an accident (they were not killed but injured badly, back then). The other driver staggered out of the vehicle, plastered.
The reason drunks survive accidents is becuz they r more *loose* and bounce around, thereby don't get hurt. Where as *sober* people r rigid and trying to prevent going thru windshields.
My Granddad died when he was in his 60's:'-( Just a yr after I was born. Never was able to get to know him. He was a drinker.
- 2 votes
Drunks are very good at killing themselves. But still, what doesn't add up here? Could it be that drunks aren't really that dangerous on the road per mile driven?
- 1 vote
I get drunk all the time... now that I work.. I save it for my days off, but... I DON'T DRIVE. I get a cab or have a friend take me home. I never drive. I've lost couple friends to that. I don't even chance it.
- 2 votes
Something I've noticed for a long time (as proof?) is look at how many old winos (or?) there are on the streets? Maybe some of them are dying of liver failure - but there sure are many that live to an old age!
- 2 votes
They're really only 35 years old.....they just look like they're 90.
- 5 votes
Then they go into the Street Spa aka local mental hospital where they have detox, occasional lectures on how to get your life back in gear, eat real food and a place to shower, sleep on a real bed, and lots and lots and lots of meds.
- 1 vote
I guess my life is almost over. if i start drinking now can i make up for lost time LOL
- 7 votes
My Dad died at age 57 of Serious Of The Liver, BS studies.....FYI, my wife works in a newborn intensive care unit, 3 out of 4 babies are being born drug and alcohol addicted. How many people do these heavy drinkers kill from DUI's ? How many kill out of rage ? I'm 64 and sober for 40 years, I'll take my chances being a non-drinker.
- 1 vote
3/4 seriously, you go through life thinking 75% of kids are crack heads?
You sir, need a drink.
- 9 votes
With all due respect, just because you had a problem with drinking doesn't mean even people with problems, that drink, need to stop.
- 2 votes
max- maybe in that NICU, the numbers are not like that across the board.
- 1 vote
as of right now, given the conditions we are facing.............. I think i'll limit my time in lala land, thanks tho:)
I prefer alert at the moment.
- 1 vote
I think what you are missing is the definition of heavy drinker really isn't that heavy a drinker. A guy who has five or six a day isn't really that drunk.
- 2 votes
Is your point how far apart the drinks are? If they are fairly close together, then 5 or 6 drinks (assuming an average metabolism rate) is pretty drunk.
- 3 votes
five or six drinks in a day would level me.. never took to the liquor like some other people
- 3 votes
I think what you are missing is the definition of heavy drinker really isn't that heavy a drinker. A guy who has five or six a day isn't really that drunk.
Lmfao.... Yeah if you paced yourself over the day.... no biggie. But slam those down in 2-3 hrs and you got a nice buzz going on.
- 2 votes
Just smoke marijuana, that hasnt killed anybody.
- 7 votes
2 places you never see meatheads getting into a fight;
A strip joint and a pot party.
- 2 votes
Yes, so let's legalize it already. OK .. dude lets legalize it like .. tomorrow .. ok I'm tired ..zzzz
- 3 votes
Legalize...Don't critici....I forgot what I was talking about. Anybody got some cheetos?
- 3 votes
GREG, That stuff will likely kill ya...evidently you haven't seen the reality inspired, psuedo-documentary movie "Reefer Madness".
- 1 vote
A strip joint and a pot party.
I've seen it happen at a strip joint. Only once though. Between a group of Blacks and Samoans got into it over some racial @!$%#. Got ugly fast. Bouncers got there ass kicked, the place cleared out and a grip of cops came. Party over. Lol.
Heavy Drinkers Outlive Nondrinkers, Study Finds
That's 'cause they're asleep when they run into sober people.
- 2 votes
About 2 or 3 glasses of wine a day is it for me. I have a lot of fun learning about wine!
- 3 votes
Does beer count?
- 1 vote
Depends on what you call beer. That soda pop like Coors and Bud, I would say no, but I'm a snob.
- 3 votes
An American on vacation in Australia walked into a pub and asked for the closest thing to American beer they had, the bartender gave him a glass of water.
Around here I drink what I can afford, it does have the advantage of filling me up before I get drunk.
- 4 votes
Booze is king in my life. I'm what you'd call a "stumblin' drunk" and feel most secure when I've reached the point of drooling. 40 years of pulling on cheap wiskey and not eating has only strengthened my immune system-my jawbone hasn't rejected one single tooth implant. I always resort to home brew when I run out of cash, and make "pruno" out of fermented fruit every time I'm in the joint. The only negative thing all the years of boozing has caused is yellowing in my eyes which doesn't afffect my vision at all. Hey, I'm even still popular with the ladies....they think my bulbous, red, veiny nose is cute! Screw the gym, I'm off to the bar!
- 3 votes
Screw the gym, I'm off to the bar!
I told a bunch of wheatgrass, eating steroid abusing muscleheads once "Every hour your in the gym, I'm talking up your girlfriends at the Bar! All that work, and the one muscle they want to enlarge is inure to excercise. Except maybe for c*ck pushups.
- 1 vote
Bduck- I agree, there is nothing better then waking up with that cheap booze headache, sheets covered in heave, whiz and pinch. A used tampon on the pillow next to you not knowing if you won a bet and that was the prize. Going out and seeing your car bashed up with blood on the passenger seat from someone with poor hygeine. Also the portion of the drunk when all you remember is how good the woman look with beer goggles on and you wind up with a smoker that looks and smells like Lassies eye o brown..
- 2 votes
seriously not funny guys. Not even with dripping sarcasm quotes.
- 1 vote
bdobb the Stumbler- I fogot to mention the newly found sores on your sack that show up because your new bar gal likes a good tea bagger. "Hey bar-keep, whats that old douche bag drinking?" "Let me set her with a vineger and water on the rocks." Be careful of the fumes, they can be toxic.
Marvin,
Wow, there must be a lot of hard bark on that GAL. Hopefully no infected Bartholin gland "down there" to worry about, hub? Goen finichwid samychtyme.
Duck-For some reason she wore a Levi jacket and had jerky labes for gnawing.
muscompletesamich
Blearc...THANK YOU!!!
According to scientific research, that makes 3 things I got going for me;
I shouldn't get gloucoma
I should have a healthy prostate
I'm gonna live longer!
- 2 votes
Don't know what you think will keep your prostate healthy- but if its the orgasm a day theory it ain't true.
sure the heavy drinkers out live the non-drinkers.. they're passed out at home over the toilet while every body else is out bike riding rock climbing water surfing.. doing all sorts of cool things that unfortunately have a high accident and death rate. so while you might live longer being a heavy drinker.. it'll be a long life of not remembering what you did last night and puking your guts out. I'll take drinking not so often and having fun over that
- 4 votes
I just read another study that said that even one drink a day increases a woman's chance of breast cancer. So maybe you don't die , you just get breast cancer? My liver always hurts and my enzymes are always high, I can feel it if I just have one drink. I drank a lot in my younger years, 14 until about 30 but by then the damage was done. I don't have hep C but almost everyone I know does. So maybe in my personal demographic circles this is a bad idea.
All our kids friends rock climb, extreme ski, mountain bike, and drink and smoke wacky weed like there is no tomorrow. That extreme sports groups are a bunch of luahes
- 1 vote
That study showed an increase but only infinitesimally. You don't want to live in a bubble. Were this true, the French and Germans would have higher rates of BrCa, and the Norwegians lower, and it is actually the opposite. My great aunts never had a drink in their lives, and died of breast cancer.
Just so you know- HepC has no connection to alcohol. If you have any sort of hepatitis you shouldn't drink. There are many types of hepatitis, and perhaps you have one of those. There is alcoholic hepatitis, generally reversible if you quit drinking. There is Cirrhosis, not reversible, but also usually not just simply from drinking, alpha-1 antitrypsin etc.
I know that hep C is not from drinking, but drinking with Hep C is a bad idea. Also drinking can cause Cirrhosis without having contracted Hep C. I saw many a Viet Nam vet die from Cirrhosis in their 20s from drinking. Alcohol can kill you and make you really stupid and more likely to contract some of the hepatitis strains as well. If you are an alcoholic it is unlikely that you are going to quit drinking because you are already an alcoholic-hence most likely addicted.
As for the breast cancer I disagree with you totally. BrCa(#) is a gene for breast cancer. There are certain genetic groups who have higher or lower rates of breast cancer genes. This being said, alcohol's effect on breast cancer rates, especially certain types is very significant. Obviously vegan,no drinking, meditators can and do get breast cancer. But that doesn't mean that women can drink with no consequences for breast cancer. So I would recheck that if I were you. I don't know if you are male or female, but that stats are clear. If you are a medical doctor, and advising patients? I would really recheck this.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100823162318.htm
The authors write, "We found that women who drank one or more drinks per day had about double the risk of lobular type breast cancer, but no increase in their risk of ductal type breast cancer. It is important to note that ductal cancer is much more common than lobular cancer accounting for about 70 percent of all breast cancers whereas lobular cancer accounts for only about 10-15 percent of cases
."
So it is Russian Roulette with your breasts. Also HRT in postmenopausal women also increases this sort of cancer, and this is the age group most effected. I think women can drink all they want, but they should be aware that the effects of drinking when young are not yet known, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders can be caused by as little as one drink at the wrong time (there is no cure and it lasts a lifetime) and they are also researching now whether or not sperm damage from alcohol can also cause FASD. So drink away, but be aware of the possible consequences.
- 1 vote
Actually, yes, BrCA is a gene, it is associated with breast cancer- but only 30% of people with the gene get cancer! So it is not a cancer sentence, and there are people who get cancer who do not have the gene!
As I said yes, this found drinking increased the risk, but in absolute terms it only raised it a very small amount. You said it best- even vegan- yoga doing- meditating- skinny people get breast cancer- we just do not know enough for me not to live my life. BTW- obesity has a much higher risk association, and I do not see you talking about that.
I am a female whose mother and several aunts have had cancer. I drink and I have never had children, and I am on HRT. My risk is sky high- there is nothing I can do about that- and no I would not stop drinking or my HRT thinking it would reduce those risk factors. I am a medical doctor, and I have read the original work, and I am very comfortable with my decisions for myself and my patients.
FAS cannot be caused by one drink no matter when that drink might occur. If sperm damage was actual, or enough to cause fertility issues, college girls wouldn't get pregnant, and they do, alot. Sounds like you are very anti drinking- and that is cool, just don't try to misrepresent science.
- 1 vote
www.faslink.org
Tell me doctor, since you say I am the one misrepresenting science? How many drinks does it take to cause brain damage and FASD (the correct term for the disorders?)
You cannot say that one drink will not cause brain damage, so please, maybe follow your own advice about science.
I did not say anything about people being unable to get pregnant from the sperm damage. If anything drinking may increase the risk of unintended pregnancy by lowering inhibitions, and making the use of contraception more difficult or undesirable.
You can think whatever you want but the data shows that drinking does increase the risk of breast cancer, and I hope you would at least inform your patients honestly. If you want to engage in risky behavior, and say @!$%# it , I'll do what I want, that is fine with me, but don't tell my daughters that there isn't a risk worth avoiding.
Also this study was of people aged 55-65. What about all those who died of liver failure, car crashes, and other alcohol related problems before 55?
The risk of breast cancer gets much higher starting at 60. So many in the study here, may have breast cancer and not yet be aware of it. They might be dead at 66. Or they might die before 55 from alcohol related breast cancer. This study is really flawed in this way.
As for me, you make quite a few assumptions that are not correct. I am not anti-drinking. I drink occasionally. Different populations have higher genetic risks than others that can account for differences in outcome. Not all groups metabolize alcohol the same. Women do not metabolize alcohol the same as men. Sperm damage HAS already been proven. They are still studying the effect on a fetus. What is unclear so far is if it can cause similar irreversible brain damage as female drinking can. I would wait and see on that , but wouldn't take chances in the mean time.
Drinking during reproduction activities in my opinion is really stupid. It is a risk that if you lose on the bet has lifelong terrible consequences with no treatment. bottoms up.
Cheers!
These mutations can lead to birth defects, miscarriage, or illness in the resulting baby. When children with fathers who are heavy drinkers and non-alcoholic mothers are compared with those with FAS, the children of the drinking fathers are not grossly malformed, but they do have certain intellectual and functional deficits, and they are also more likely to be hyperactive.
- 1 vote
What the hell. Ya gotta die of something. You might as well die after living a life of wretched excess. Otherwise, what the @!$%# is the point? Enjoy yourself. Eat the red meat, take the chances, drink if you like, smoke some pot if it makes you feel good and why not? Guess what, in 100 years you're going to be just as dead as the person three graves over who didn't do any of those things and watched his health perfectly, because he's gonna be buried too.
You only go around once. If you choose to make it more pleasurable and sacrifice some time because of it, more power to you. When it comes time for you to die none of the friends or family members of fitness freaks on TV are going to die along with you, so enjoy life in the manner you choose. If they want to bitch? @!$%# 'em.
- 4 votes
I drink occasionally, and see no real problem with it. But I do see a problem with how unaware people are of how one drink or drinking while sexually active in reproductive years can indeed increase a lifespan of hell for those who are impacted by FASD.
It is probable that 10% to 15% of children are significantly enough affected by prenatal alcohol exposure to require special education. As they become adults, FASD does not disappear but the issues of youth translate into ongoing problems in family relationships, employment, mental health and justice conflicts. The cost to the individuals affected, their families and society are enormous and as a society, we cannot afford to ignore them.
To ignore the facts does not change the facts.
- 1 vote
Drinking Alcohol Increases Life Span
"a team of researchers led by psychologist Charles Holahan of the University of Texas showed that even across all levels of socioeconomic status, physical activity, social support, mortality rates were highest for those who’d never been drinkers, and they were lowest for moderate drinkers."
The U of Texas report is where this new study originated.
Your Headline is inaccurate.
Hey Jerry, your link, links to to the same Time article...........
Not sure why you have a hard on for the title, since I didn't change it but here's the end of your link:
The study followed 1,824 subjects between ages 55 and 65 who had had any kind of outpatient care within the last three years. Just over 69% of the never-drinkers died during the 20 years, 60% of the heavy drinkers died and only 41% of moderate drinkers died
So since 69 is greater than 60, your hated author was not mistaken.
- 2 votes
69% of the never-drinkers died during the 20 years, 60% of the heavy drinkers died and only 41% of moderate drinkers died
I'll concede that the headline is factually accurate, however the article is misleading in that it takes secondary notice to the fact that moderate drinkers have a much lower mortality rate than "all of the above."
To imply that heavy drinking is somehow a healthier lifestyle is just wrong.
The study indicates that non-drinkers may have a shorter lifespan, at least in part, because they lead more stressful lives.
But, to resort to heavy drinking to increase your survival chances by only 9% doesn't make sense, when you can increase your survival chances by 19% with moderate drinking.
Sorry about the link thing, my link is to a Blisstree article that re-posted the article from Time.
As for Cloud; he's not "my" hated author, he's a just guy with a questionable reputation as a Journalist.
- 1 vote
yeah because so many heavy drinkers were already weeded out well before age 55 where the study picks up. common sense. Had another friend of a friend killed by yet another drunk driver. Common sense says drinking may not kill you , but it might kill somebody else if not done responsibly.
- 1 vote
I like this study, mainly because it has a couple things I look for in any study. One is that there are a large number of participants, and another is long-term following of the participants. This study has both. 1800 subjects were followed for 20 years. That is a heck of a lot better than a couple hundred people who were in some quickie six-week study.
They were also able to control for variables:
But even after controlling for nearly all imaginable variables — socioeconomic status, level of physical activity, number of close friends, quality of social support and so on — the researchers (a six-member team led by psychologist Charles Holahan of the University of Texas at Austin) found that over a 20-year period, mortality rates were highest for those who had never been drinkers, second-highest for heavy drinkers and lowest for moderate drinkers.
- 4 votes
Minnie, this study lasted longer than many of the FDA approvals. That should tell us something!
As long as the participants were honest about how much they drank, it is a very interesting finding. I still think that everyone's system is different, and what works for one, might not work for another.
- 5 votes
I think that the headline is flawed in this article. The basis for this article is certainly nothing new. The scientific community has known for many years that "modest" consumption of alcohol has certain beneficial effects on the human body. The headline implies that one must become a sot in order to reap these benefits. In fact the opposite is true. As our Grandmothers used to say "we are what we eat (and drink) and "all things in moderation." Excessive consumption of anything, even water and oxygen and food, can have potentially damaging and even lethal effects on us.
I sometimes say, with tongue firmly in cheek, that "life can be hazardous to your health" but as silly as it sounds that is a very true statement. From the moment that we spring forth from the warmth and safety of our mother's womb we begin an epic journey with many perils in our path and many choices and decisions to be made. With each passing day more and more of those choices and decisions are made by us alone. While some of us may feel that our fate is pretty well pre-programmed the quality of our life up until we confront our ultimate end depends to a large extent upon those choices and decisions we made along the way. For those who don't believe in a kind of pre-destination then those choices and decision become even more meaningful in your life.
- 3 votes
At 6 o'clock, I am going to choose a bottle of wine probably have 3 glasses with dinner, and contemplate what you said, shepherd!
- 2 votes
HEH HEH HEH HEH common sense I will most likely join you but my preferred poison is three fingers of Old Forester on the rocks. Helps me sleep and seems to move my digestive tract along too. :=))
- 1 vote
LOL doctorsteph I would love to lay claim to that little line but alas i plagerized it from some long forgotten contemporary philosopher. That is my style though. I dilly dally through life collecting such little philosophical tidbits and then stitch them together like a quilt so as to come up with my own 'life philosophy.' HEH HEH HEH HEH May not look too fancy but it works for me. :=))
- 1 vote
I think that is great!! Alliterative life quilts right here on the vine!! FRP
- 1 vote
doctorsteph thank you for your friend request. It has been duly accepted. Not sure of the origin of the term 'dilly.' I know about 'deusey' as it came from the old Deusenberg automobile. Maybe the folks at Dairy Queen know since they sell a Dilly Bar. LOL
- 1 vote
For me, dilly came from gran, and she is gone so I can't ask her- sorry!
No need to appologize. The English language is rife with such euphemisms and many of them have unknown origins. These can come from a number of English speaking countries which might account for the variety and certainly some of them are quite local or regional in nature and just 'catch on' in the popular vernacular. Not surprisingly one that is perhaps derogatory can, over time, become almost complimentary or vice versa as our culture evolves. This is what keeps linguists in business I suppose LOL. Somebody has to try and keep track right? HEH HEH HEH HEH
- 1 vote
Somebody- you perhaps?? Love the fact that you know this stuff!!
Just another little patch in my 'philosophical quilt.' :=)) Trouble is, I know a little bit about a lot of things and a lot about nothing. LOL As one of my friends put it I fall into the "just enough to be dangerous" category. I call it being prepared for a really boring coctail party. HEH HEH HEH HEH
- 2 votes
Damn! I read it wrong. Being a little over weight I thought the article meant over weight drinkers live longer. Oh well...I don't drink much anyways, so I guess it doesn't matter.
- 4 votes
In 1910, The Five leading causes of death were:
1. Pneumonia and influenza
2. Tuberculosis
3. Diarrhea
4. Heart disease
5. Stroke
The average life expectancy for men was 47 years.
Since then, life expectancy grew by 30 years, the top 5 now include cancer and accidents. Alzheimers and diabetes are pushing upwards to join in the list.
A more recent study concluded that we will all die, and if we live long enough, we will die of these, or of something else. You can drink to that!
- 4 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



